2011年7月17日 星期日

Barker Review of Housing Supply

Delivering stability: securing our future housing needs

Barker Review of Housing Supply - Final Report - Recommendations

Building on analysis presented in the Interim Report, Kate Barker presents choices for Government depending on its objectives for housing.
  • The UK has experienced a long-term upward trend in real house prices, 2.4 per cent per annum over the last 30 years.  This has created problems of affordability.  In addition, the volatility of the housing market has exacerbated problems of macroeconomic instability and has had an adverse effect on economic growth.  To improve macroeconomic stability and deliver greater affordability for individuals a lower trend in house prices is desirable: 
  • In order to deliver a trend in real house prices of 1.8 per cent an additional 70,000 houses each year in England might be required.
  • To bring the real price trend in line with the EU average of 1.1 per cent an extra 120,000 houses each year might be required.
The Barker Review’s final report sets out a range of policy recommendations for improving the functioning of the housing market:
  • Government should set out a goal for improved market affordability.
  • Additional investment building-up to between £1.2 and £1.6 billion per annum will be required to deliver additional social housing to meet projected future needs.
  • Introduction of a Planning-gain Supplement to capture some of the development gains that landowners benefit from, to ensure that local communities share in the value of development.
  • Establishment of a Regional Planning Executive to provide public advice to the Regional Planning Body on the scale and distribution of housing required to meet the market affordability target.
  • Introduction of flexibility at the local level through the allocation of additional land in Local Development Frameworks, with the release of this additional land triggered by market signals.
  • Establishment of a Community Infrastructure Fund to help to unlock some of the barriers to development.
  • Local authorities should be allowed to “keep” the council tax receipts from new housing developments for a period of time to provide incentives for growth and to meet transitional costs associated with development.
  • Structured advice has come to light in recent years on stop repossession and implications of such actions.
  • The report does not take into account claims due to theft of outdoor items such as teak garden furniture or other designer items such as dining room furniture.

2011年7月11日 星期一

港鐵物業發展招標問題

樓盡六壬 - 鍾慧娟
西鐵項目
(2011年07月11日)

地鐵與九鐵合併後,作為九鐵唯一股東的政府,將西鐵物業發展項目交由港鐵(066)以代理人身份作招標,但港鐵一直沿用其一貫「邀標」方式,加上分紅機制備受市場質疑,更一直將中小型發展商拒於入場門檻之外,欠缺透明度及公平性。

上周政府高姿態「踢走」港鐵,改由地政總署負責招標事宜,並以「一個價格」、「價高者得」來作評分標準,方法無疑簡單直接,值得一讚。

看看過往港鐵補地價,為何一直屬於「低市價」,有指其未計及「鐵路效應」,令逾百億元的補地價動輒少補10億至20億元,這部分正好成為日後發展商與港鐵日後「分紅」利潤,這種不合理現象,在新招標方式下不再出現,發展商要承擔的前期風險大大提高了。

此外,港鐵負責招標的項目,會要求發展商先表達「意向」,再以「邀標」選擇那些發展商參與,這種只招請「小圈子」的方式,對中小型發展商極不公平,加上「分紅」準則無定義,亦曾有大發展商炮轟指:「分紅九成予港鐵,仍未能取得項目。」既然港鐵不公布補地價金額及分紅比例,政府是次以「一個價格」模式取代無疑是好事,日後西鐵分紅亦只得5%。

有中小型發展商更指出,過往就算願意合組財團參與入標,港鐵亦可將門檻提高以作阻撓,如牽頭發展商有財力證明,同時需佔逾五成股權,故就算找到願意出資財團,亦不符合入標資格,造成鐵路項目成為大發展商囊中物,現時則可透過與海外財團或基金等合作,加上政府要求建「限呎」單位及「實而不華」的非豪宅項目,對中小型發展商亦有利,大大提高他們參與西鐵項目的興趣。

作者為本報地產版編輯